Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Hollingsworth
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucas Hollingsworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. This is a fictional character that appeared in one double episode of The Golden Girls, namely the final one. The character has no real-world notability or coverage and is a very minor character of little importance within the fictional work. Nonnotable per WP:FICT. The de-PRODder recommended a merge and redirect, but it isn't clear what the target would be, since we have no List of minor Golden Girls characters. +Angr 05:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. +Angr 05:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. +Angr 05:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can imagine that even Leslie Nielsen would be asking "Who the hell is Lucas Hollingworth?" This article dates from Wikipedia's "I-saw-it-on-TV" days, when a great deal of the submissions were detailed descriptions of the plot of a TV episode, extensive biographies of a character in the episode, and literary analyses of a quote from a character in the episode. Off to The Golden Girls Wiki with him. Thank you for being a friend. Mandsford (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary or third party sources, so the character is unverifiable and non-notable. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- we verify plot facts preferably from the primary source, which is more accurate. DGG ( talk ) 00:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.